+ -
当前位置:首页 → 问答吧 → ext4 benchmark(zz)

ext4 benchmark(zz)

时间:2009-01-11

来源:互联网

From: Curt Wohlgemuth <curtw <at> google.com>
Subject: Ext4 without a journal: some benchmark results
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.file-systems.ext4
Date: 2009-01-07 19:29:11 GMT (3 days and 36 minutes ago)

Hi:

I promised back in mid-December to send out some benchmark numbers I'm
seeing with Frank Mayhar's work to allow ext4 to run without a journal. My
apologies for the delay...

I ran both iozone and compilebench on the following filesystems, using a
2.6.26-based kernel, with most ext4 patches applied. This is on a x86 based
4-core system, with a separate disk for these runs.

ext2, default create/mount options
ext3, default create/mount options
ext4, default create/mount options
ext4, created with "-O ^has_journal"

For each filesystem, I ran each benchmark twice, doing a mke2fs before each
run. The same disk was used for each run; all benchmarks ran in the mount
directory of the newly mkfs'ed disk. I averaged the values for the two runs
for each FS/thread number.

Iozone was run with the following command line:

iozone -t (# threads) -s 2g -r 256k -I -T -i0 -i1 -i2

I.e., throughput mode; 2GiB file; 256KiB buffer; O_DIRECT. Tests were
limited to

write/rewrite
read/re-read
random-read/write

I ran iozone twice for each FS: with a single thread (-t 1) and with 8
threads (-t 8).

Compilebench was run with the following command line:

compilebench -D (mount dir) -i 10 -r 30

I.e., 10 kernel trees, 30 "random operation" runs.

Results follow.

Thanks,
Curt

Iozone
======
ext2 : 1 thread
---------------
Average throughput:
Type Mean Stddev
initial_writers: 56.6 MB/s ( 0.2)
rewriters: 58.4 MB/s ( 0.2)
readers: 66.3 MB/s ( 0.2)
re-readers: 66.5 MB/s ( 0.0)
random_readers: 22.4 MB/s ( 0.1)
random_writers: 18.8 MB/s ( 0.0)

ext2 : 8 threads
----------------
Average throughput:
Type Mean Stddev
initial_writers: 28.5 MB/s ( 0.0)
rewriters: 43.5 MB/s ( 0.1)
readers: 51.5 MB/s ( 0.1)
re-readers: 51.8 MB/s ( 0.2)
random_readers: 20.3 MB/s ( 0.0)
random_writers: 17.3 MB/s ( 0.0)

ext3 : 1 thread
----------------
Average throughput:
Type Mean Stddev
initial_writers: 56.3 MB/s ( 0.2)
rewriters: 58.2 MB/s ( 0.1)
readers: 66.4 MB/s ( 0.1)
re-readers: 66.1 MB/s ( 0.2)
random_readers: 22.1 MB/s ( 0.1)
random_writers: 18.6 MB/s ( 0.1)

ext3 : 8 threads
----------------
Average throughput:
Type Mean Stddev
initial_writers: 28.7 MB/s ( 0.1)
rewriters: 43.2 MB/s ( 0.2)
readers: 51.5 MB/s ( 0.0)
re-readers: 51.5 MB/s ( 0.0)
random_readers: 20.2 MB/s ( 0.0)
random_writers: 17.3 MB/s ( 0.0)

ext4-nojournal : 1 thread
-------------------------
Average throughput:
Type Mean Stddev
initial_writers: 66.3 MB/s ( 0.2)
rewriters: 66.6 MB/s ( 0.1)
readers: 66.4 MB/s ( 0.0)
re-readers: 66.4 MB/s ( 0.0)
random_readers: 22.4 MB/s ( 0.1)
random_writers: 19.4 MB/s ( 0.2)

ext4-nojournal : 8 threads
--------------------------
Average throughput:
Type Mean Stddev
initial_writers: 56.1 MB/s ( 0.1)
rewriters: 60.3 MB/s ( 0.2)
readers: 61.0 MB/s ( 0.0)
re-readers: 61.0 MB/s ( 0.0)
random_readers: 20.4 MB/s ( 0.1)
random_writers: 18.3 MB/s ( 0.1)

ext4-stock : 1 thread
----------------------
Average throughput:
Type Mean Stddev
initial_writers: 65.5 MB/s ( 0.1)
rewriters: 65.7 MB/s ( 0.2)
readers: 65.8 MB/s ( 0.2)
re-readers: 65.6 MB/s ( 0.3)
random_readers: 21.9 MB/s ( 0.0)
random_writers: 19.1 MB/s ( 0.1)

ext4-stock : 8 threads
----------------------
Average throughput:
Type Mean Stddev
initial_writers: 53.7 MB/s ( 0.2)
rewriters: 58.3 MB/s ( 0.1)
readers: 58.8 MB/s ( 0.1)
re-readers: 59.0 MB/s ( 0.1)
random_readers: 20.2 MB/s ( 0.0)
random_writers: 18.1 MB/s ( 0.0)

Compilebench
============

ext2
----
Average values:
Type Mean Stddev
initial_create: 57.9 MB_s ( 1.9)
new_create: 13.0 MB_s ( 0.2)
patch: 7.3 MB_s ( 0.1)
compile: 25.6 MB_s ( 0.6)
clean: 70.4 MB_s ( 1.3)
read_tree: 22.1 MB_s ( 0.0)
read_compiled_tree: 33.3 MB_s ( 0.2)
delete_tree: 6.5 secs ( 0.2)
stat_tree: 5.2 secs ( 0.0)
stat_compiled_tree: 5.7 secs ( 0.1)

ext3
----
Average values:
Type Mean Stddev
initial_create: 30.6 MB_s ( 2.2)
new_create: 13.5 MB_s ( 0.2)
patch: 10.6 MB_s ( 0.1)
compile: 18.0 MB_s ( 0.3)
clean: 41.7 MB_s ( 1.8)
read_tree: 21.5 MB_s ( 0.2)
read_compiled_tree: 20.4 MB_s ( 1.1)
delete_tree: 13.5 secs ( 0.3)
stat_tree: 6.7 secs ( 0.4)
stat_compiled_tree: 9.6 secs ( 2.9)

ext4-nojournal
--------------
Average values:
Type Mean Stddev
initial_create: 77.1 MB_s ( 0.2)
new_create: 22.0 MB_s ( 0.1)
patch: 13.1 MB_s ( 0.0)
compile: 36.0 MB_s ( 0.1)
clean: 592.4 MB_s (39.4)
read_tree: 17.8 MB_s ( 0.2)
read_compiled_tree: 22.1 MB_s ( 0.1)
delete_tree: 2.5 secs ( 0.0)
stat_tree: 2.2 secs ( 0.0)
stat_compiled_tree: 2.5 secs ( 0.0)

ext4-stock
----------
Average values:
Type Mean Stddev
initial_create: 59.7 MB_s ( 0.4)
new_create: 20.5 MB_s ( 0.0)
patch: 12.5 MB_s ( 0.0)
compile: 33.9 MB_s ( 0.2)
clean: 539.5 MB_s ( 3.6)
read_tree: 17.1 MB_s ( 0.1)
read_compiled_tree: 21.8 MB_s ( 0.1)
delete_tree: 2.7 secs ( 0.1)
stat_tree: 2.4 secs ( 0.0)
stat_compiled_tree: 2.5 secs ( 0.2)

作者: stahine   发布时间: 2009-01-11

No comments, no discussions, no recommendations but merely a set of raw data.

So...what?

作者: d00m3d   发布时间: 2009-01-11