当前位置：首页 → 问答吧 → 小米除左行唔到iOS外，连员工服同摆设都抄足Apple

小米除左行唔到iOS外，连员工服同摆设都抄足Apple

时间：2014-06-14

来源：互联网

中国设计真系只可以去抄，可能迟d开埋落地玻璃既小米store

附件 mobile_1.jpg (91.9 KB)

2014-5-17 11:24 AM

mobile_1.jpg (91.9 KB)

2014-5-17 11:24 AM

作者: 肥熊仔发布时间: 2014-06-14

好抄唔抄抄iphone, 又唔系好用，鬼唔望冚包散

作者: 毒蛇吐利发布时间: 2014-06-14

引用:原帖由毒蛇吐利於 2014-5-18 05:00 AM 发表
好抄唔抄抄iphone, 又唔系好用，鬼唔望冚包散

http://n2.hk/d/images/r10/androidD.jpg

第一个抄苹果专门店唔小米，系三星，你自己google下科技新闻，自有答案

作者: 三星激能死碌吐发布时间: 2014-06-14

好唔好用见人见智，但如果苹果学你话冚包散
贵为多年全球市值第一企业，若然冚包散既话会对全球经济影响几大？
同埋连带其他好多间接有关联既公司机构会发生咩问题？
你地唔钟意苹果一回事，但有D野谂清楚先好讲
同埋唔该唔好抹杀苹果一直既努力，苹果唔出IOS根本就唔会有依家既ANDROID

作者: hayatoyeung 发布时间: 2014-06-14

引用:原帖由毒蛇吐利於 2014-5-18 05:00 AM 发表
好抄唔抄抄iphone, 又唔系好用，鬼唔望冚包散

http://n2.hk/d/images/r10/androidD.jpg

So let's see. You want to copy someone else's path in order to have similar success. You would:
1) copy Samsung who pretty aggressively copies Apple anyways (at least in the very beginning)
2) copy sony / HTC / Motorola who doesn't seem to be making a lot of money off the android market
Or
3) copy the company that is the second largest company in the world with quarterly results blowing analyst expectation and records time and again because of their mobile / ecosystem desogn (Apple sure didn't get that big because of their MacBook Pro)?

I think it's a rational choice don't you think?

作者: 熊爸爸发布时间: 2014-06-14

你讲乜呀？

作者: aaaaccccb 发布时间: 2014-06-14

无当日既苹果iphone,唔会有你地老细三星出现囉，仲咁嚣张

作者: Creation@ 发布时间: 2014-06-14

引用:原帖由三星激能死碌吐於 2014-5-18 02:33 PM 发表第一个抄苹果专门店唔小米，系三星，你自己google下科技新闻，自有答案http://n2.hk/d/images/r10/mobile.jpg

三星老早就用大mon, 而苹果就用长mon, 咁都叫抄就唔好学人玩电话市场啦，电话有12个制苹果都可以叫抄啦

作者: 毒蛇吐利发布时间: 2014-06-14

引用:原帖由毒蛇吐利於 2014-5-19 09:10 AM 发表
三星老早就用大mon, 而苹果就用长mon, 咁都叫抄就唔好学人玩电话市场啦，电话有12个制苹果都可以叫抄啦

睇多d新闻

唔好咁肤浅

作者: FIFAlpha 发布时间: 2014-06-14

引用:原帖由毒蛇吐利於 2014-5-19 09:10 AM 发表
三星老早就用大mon, 而苹果就用长mon, 咁都叫抄就唔好学人玩电话市场啦，电话有12个制苹果都可以叫抄啦

http://n2.hk/d/images/r10/androidD.jpg

There's no shame in copying, especially if you copy and extend with your own creativity. The early galaxy were pretty blatant copies of iPhones in terms of form, and trade-dress, so much so that the lawyers weren't able to tell the two apart.

Samsung has since done a better job in adding their own differentiation to make it less of a copy, and that's great.

In the beginning though everyone in the industry can see samsung as copy-cat. Now not so much. (I think apple just won the law suit on this)

作者: A-for-? 发布时间: 2014-06-14

先左

作者: 熊爸爸发布时间: 2014-06-14

引用:原帖由毒蛇吐利於 2014-5-19 09:10 AM 发表三星老早就用大mon, 而苹果就用长mon, 咁都叫抄就唔好学人玩电话市场啦，电话有12个制苹果都可以叫抄啦

最早用笀应该系大陆山寨机先啱，
三叔先抄大陆

作者: toyoaltezza 发布时间: 2014-06-14

小米初初都唔错，点解要咁样

作者: 贱Ling之队发布时间: 2014-06-14

智能手机系统边个出先？答我PLX

作者: hugo2006 发布时间: 2014-06-14

所以我一定唔会用佢囉。

作者: hayatoyeung 发布时间: 2014-06-14

引用:原帖由 hayatoyeung 於 2014-5-19 08:26 PM 发表
智能手机系统边个出先？答我PLX

Devices that combined telephony and computing were first conceptualized in 1973, and were offered for sale beginning in 1993. The term "smartphone" first appeared in 1997, when Ericsson described its GS 88 "